openSTA - WAS RE: [Webtest] load tests with WebTest

[Christian Sell]

hmm, Jelly is one of those animals that I am still having a hard time 
figuring out (is that what the name indicates?).

I suppose in this case Jelly would take the place of ANT, right? What 
would be the advantages?

Bernhard Wagner wrote:
> BTW what do you people think of Jelly ?
> (http://jakarta.apache.org/commons/sandbox/jelly/)
> 
> What are your opinions seeing Jelly as a candidate to host WebTest?
> One problem might be that httpunit and HttpClient (which is used by Jelly)
> are somewhat competing in functionality.
> 
> Bernhard
> 
> 
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: webtest-admin@lists.canoo.com
>>[mailto:webtest-admin@lists.canoo.com]On Behalf Of Christian Sell
>>Sent: Dienstag, 14. Januar 2003 13:39
>>To: webtest@gate.canoo.com
>>Subject: Re: openSTA - WAS RE: [Webtest] load tests with WebTest
>>
>>
>>thats the beauty of HttpUnit/WebTest: I can tell it to "click on the
>>link which includes the String XXX". It will then parse the response and
>>find the appropriate link (including dynamically generated parameters)
>>and create a request from it - just as if a user clicked on it. No
>>issues with session Ids and the like... Only drawback is I have no
>>recording facility
>>
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>