[Webtest] Adapt classes for extension

[Dierk Koenig]

Hi Marc,

yes, I fully agree. The change is now available (build 347).

Currently it is only for StoreXPath but I guess other steps need to 
self encapsulate their properties as well.

thanx
Mittie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: webtest-admin@lists.canoo.com
> [mailto:webtest-admin@lists.canoo.com]On Behalf Of Marc Guillemot
> Sent: Mittwoch, 23. Juli 2003 11:49
> To: webtest@lists.canoo.com
> Subject: [Webtest] Adapt classes for extension
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> the changes made to facilitate implementation of custom steps or custom
> changes to existing steps seem great. Yet the step classes could 
> be improved
> to facilitate extension.
> 
> Ex: in com.canoo.webtest.steps.StoreXPath
> 
> 2 member properties:
>     private String fXPath = null;
>     private String fProperty = null;
> 
> but
> - only setters and no getters for these
> - member methods set/get directly the values without to use 
> setter (and non
> existing getter)
> 
> Therefore a child class has to overwrite far more as it should if 
> the class
> com.canoo.webtest.steps.StoreXPath would have been designed for 
> inheritance.
> 
> Marc.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>