[Webtest] Re: WebTest Result Viewer: UVC vs. Applet
Sat, 7 Aug 2004 18:15:57 +0200
all code will be open-source and I'm fairly sure that
we will find a license solution that enables all webtest users
to use it free of charge.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: email@example.com
> [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Roman Moukhine =
> Sent: Mittwoch, 4. August 2004 23:11
> To: email@example.com
> Subject: [Webtest] Re: WebTest Result Viewer: UVC vs. Applet
> Hello Dierk
> Sorry about misspelling of ULC.
> >Do you have any special reason for preferring the Applet solution?
> Technically I don't know how far advanced ULC as a "thing=20
> client". You are right about transfering item only which are=20
> requested by client. This could save time and traffic.
> I'm worring as well about licence. WebTools is an open source=20
> project. It would be nice to have all tools around at least=20
> "share ware or free".
> best regards
> - ram
> ----- Original Message -----=20
> From: "Dierk Koenig" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Newsgroups: gmane.comp.web.canoo.webtest
> Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 2004 4:22 PM
> Subject: RE: WebTest Result Viewer: UVC vs. Applet
> first, it's ULC not UVC (stands for Ultra Light Client).
> second, this application is targeted at situations where you have
> a large number of possibly large resultfiles to explore.
> These files reside on the server.
> ULC allows to _transparently_ have only those items sent to the
> client that the user currently explores (lazy loading).
> Do you have any special reason for preferring the Applet solution?
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: email@example.com
> > [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]On Behalf Of Roman Moukhine =
> > Sent: Dienstag, 3. August 2004 19:51
> > To: email@example.com
> > Subject: [Webtest] WebTest Result Viewer: UVC vs. Applet
> > Hello everybody
> > WebTest Result Viewer is simple "presentation only" application.=20
> > Why with UVC? Could it be that java applet (with Swing or even=20
> > though with AWT) suit better?
> > best regards
> > - ramYzjm~y
> >Y zfj)b=CB=9E b=D5=9Em7X=1A=C7=9E=1Chm+- (Y=EA=9A=9Fb ~y^