[Webtest] [dev] StepFailedException without step object
Marc Guillemot
webtest@lists.canoo.com
Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:19:09 +0100
or set the step in Step.handleUnexpectedException? This would perhaps be easier and could possibly bring some
simplificatons in code.
Marc.
Dierk Koenig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just saw the latest change.
>
> Making the lastResponse check in Context is
> a good idea. But we should then make Context aware
> of the current step and use that step when
> throwing the StepFailedException. Otherwise
> the error reporting will not work properly.
>
> cheers
> Mittie
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>