[Webtest] [dev] StepFailedException without step object

Marc Guillemot webtest@lists.canoo.com
Thu, 25 Nov 2004 17:19:09 +0100


or set the step in Step.handleUnexpectedException? This would perhaps be easier and could possibly bring some 
simplificatons in code.

Marc.

Dierk Koenig wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I just saw the latest change.
> 
> Making the lastResponse check in Context is
> a good idea. But we should then make Context aware
> of the current step and use that step when 
> throwing the StepFailedException. Otherwise
> the error reporting will not work properly.
> 
> cheers
> Mittie 
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>