[Webtest] [dev] StepFailedException without step object

[Dierk Koenig]

good idea.
Although this may be too late for reporting
Step(Failed|Execution)Exception.
I have to check...

cheers
Mittie

> -----Original Message-----
> From: webtest-admin@lists.canoo.com
> [mailto:webtest-admin@lists.canoo.com]On Behalf Of Marc Guillemot
> Sent: Donnerstag, 25. November 2004 17:19
> To: webtest@lists.canoo.com
> Subject: Re: [Webtest] [dev] StepFailedException without step object
> 
> 
> or set the step in Step.handleUnexpectedException? This would 
> perhaps be easier and could possibly bring some 
> simplificatons in code.
> 
> Marc.
> 
> Dierk Koenig wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > I just saw the latest change.
> > 
> > Making the lastResponse check in Context is
> > a good idea. But we should then make Context aware
> > of the current step and use that step when 
> > throwing the StepFailedException. Otherwise
> > the error reporting will not work properly.
> > 
> > cheers
> > Mittie 
> > _______________________________________________
> > WebTest mailing list
> > WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> > http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
> > 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>