[Webtest] Name of step: emulateSetHiddenInputField

Paul King webtest@lists.canoo.com
Fri, 19 May 2006 18:51:04 +1000


What about forceXxx?

Paul.

Marc Guillemot wrote:
> ok for the point: "hidden" is... hidden in the name of the step.
> 
> I'm not really happy with emulate, pseudo and simulate. Perhaps fakeXxx?
> 
> Marc.
> 
> Paul King wrote:
>> Marc Guillemot wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm quite unhappy with the name of the field emulateSetHiddenInputField.
>>>
>>> Why "emulate"? Why not simply setHiddenInputField?
>>
>> If the user could normally trigger this by using some action then
>> we should drop the emulate. But this can never be triggered directly
>> by the user. It is only provided for when tricky javascript is not
>> working. The ideal is that we get the javascript working so a longer
>> ugly name is probably a good thing.
>>
>> Alternatives: pseudoXXX, simulateXXX
>>
>> Paul.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WebTest mailing list
>> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
>> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>>
>>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
> 
>