[Webtest] Releasing 2.1 to go further?

[Sergey Batishchev]

The only fix I would be very happy to see in 2.1 before major rework is 
handleUnexpectedException fix to process macro-defs correctly (see 
discussion on WT-223 a few weeks ago).

If any of the committers have a little bit of bandwith to try this out 
before release, this would be very much appreciated. Understand that it 
might not be possible though...

Thanks!
Sergey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Marc Guillemot" <mguillemot@yahoo.fr>
To: <webtest@lists.canoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 23, 2006 4:38 AM
Subject: Re: [Webtest] Releasing 2.1 to go further?


> As it seems to be ok, when could you do it?
>
> Marc.
>
> PS: a branch could be a possibility but would require more time, no cruise 
> control is already available, ...
>
> Denis N. Antonioli wrote:
>>
>> On 22 août 06, at 10:20, Marc Guillemot wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> since too many time I talk from what will be possible (with properties, 
>>> report, memory consumption, ...) once WebTest will correctly use 
>>> UnknownElement instead of forcing instantiation of the tasks at the 
>>> beginning of <webtest>. Most of the work is done on my computer since a 
>>> long time. I compare the report generated with the "current" version to 
>>> the one generated by the "future" version and the remaining problems are 
>>> only in the filters steps.
>>> As it would already bring advantages and to allow other 
>>> committers/contributors to help finishing the work, I'd like to commit 
>>> this work (my laptop isn't a Dell, but I still dislike having these 
>>> changes only on my harddisk ;-)).
>>
>> You could make a branch for it ;-)
>>
>>>
>>> My proposition would be to release WebTest 2.1 with current state, then 
>>> I could commit all my changes and we would add extra explanations on the 
>>> download page to warn about the not fully finished changes until they're 
>>> fully fixed.
>>>
>>> What do you think?
>>
>> +1
>>
>>     dna
>>
>> --A theory has only the alternative of being right or wrong. A model
>> has a third possibility: it may be right but irrelevant.
>>   -- Manfred Eigen_______________________________________________
>> WebTest mailing list
>> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
>> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>