[Webtest] autorefresh vs. previousresponse

[Marc Guillemot]

Hi,

I don't see why it should make such a difference. If you're able to
reproduce the problem, please open an issue with the necessary information.

Cheers,
Marc.
-- 
Blog: http://mguillem.wordpress.com


Hesteric Roman - Together SK wrote:
> Hi Marc,
> 
> 	We are using previousresponse in macro-step "clickAllLinks" to
> check if all our links in page "work" properly ...
> 
> Macro looks like:
> 
> .
> .
> .
> 
> <repeat
> xpath="//a[contains(@href,'ID=')][not(contains(@href,'ID=&amp;'))][not(c
> ontains(img/@src,'fk.gif'))] bla.. bla ... " counterName="curLink">
> 	<storeXPath xpath="$curLink" property="uri" />
> 	<invoke description="Click next link" url="#{uri}"/>
> 	<not description="the word 'wurde in der Zwischenzeit' should
> not appear in the page">
>      		<verifyText description="search for the problem, case
> insensitiv" text="wurde in der Zwischenzeit" regex="false"/>
>  	</not>	
>    	<previousresponse/>
> </repeat>
> 
> .
> .
> .
> 
> 	After clicking and checking result, we use previousresponse to
> navigate <Back> to root page and so on - and that is problem using
> autorefresh, because in both cases we get various results because of
> redirect based on response body, IMHO.
> 
> 
> Roman.
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: webtest-admin@lists.canoo.com
> [mailto:webtest-admin@lists.canoo.com] On Behalf Of Marc Guillemot
> Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 11:50 AM
> To: webtest@lists.canoo.com
> Subject: Re: [Webtest] autorefresh vs. previousresponse
> 
> Hi,
> 
> at which place do you use previousResponse? Which page do you get in
> both cases?
> 
> Cheers,
> Marc.