[Webtest] webtest-Reporting

Marc Guillemot Marc Guillemot <mguillemot@yahoo.fr>
Tue, 08 Jul 2008 11:50:48 +0200


Alexander,

just to explain (again) why the format has changed:
- it scales far better (saving hours of xslt processing on large test
suites)
- it allows to run tests in parallel
- it allows to easily remove results for some tests

Cheers,
Marc.
-- 
Blog: http://mguillem.wordpress.com


Alexander Mannsfeld wrote:
> Hi there again,
> 
> regarding my yesterday's question - problem solved by coding a wrapper;
> after a test has been finished it reconstructs the old resultFile.xml
> before actually
> parsing starts - except that the "result" is now an attribute and not a
> tag like before
> it works like a charm :-) .
> 
> Perhaps this is helpfull for people confronted with the same situation
> like me :-)
> 
> Have a nice weekend,
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Alexander
> 
> Am 03.07.2008 um 13:00 schrieb Alexander Mannsfeld:
> 
>> Hi there,
>>
>> since in WebTest R1710 are some neat features like "ignoring external
>> JS-Errors" we would like to migrate to the
>> new version. Unfortunately there are some problems with the "new"
>> reporting-output.
>>
>> As we are using some scripts for automatic analytics migrating would
>> now create a huge need of manhours.
>>
>> Is there any way to upgrade with keeping the old reporting, like it is
>> in R1551? (format for the resufile.xml and folder-structure).
>>
>> Thanks in advance,
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Alexander Mannsfeld
>> Chief Quality Assurance Officer
>>
>> GD GameDuell GmbH
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> WebTest mailing list
>> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
>> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>>
> 
> Alexander Mannsfeld
> Chief Quality Assurance Officer
> _______________________________________________
> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest@lists.canoo.com
> http://lists.canoo.com/mailman/listinfo/webtest
>