Alexander Mannsfeld <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Tue, 8 Jul 2008 12:19:46 +0200
meanwhile Ive got the point - thanks for your answer anyway :-).
Am 08.07.2008 um 11:50 schrieb Marc Guillemot:
> just to explain (again) why the format has changed:
> - it scales far better (saving hours of xslt processing on large test
> - it allows to run tests in parallel
> - it allows to easily remove results for some tests
> Blog: http://mguillem.wordpress.com
> Alexander Mannsfeld wrote:
>> Hi there again,
>> regarding my yesterday's question - problem solved by coding a
>> after a test has been finished it reconstructs the old resultFile.xml
>> before actually
>> parsing starts - except that the "result" is now an attribute and
>> not a
>> tag like before
>> it works like a charm :-) .
>> Perhaps this is helpfull for people confronted with the same
>> like me :-)
>> Have a nice weekend,
>> Am 03.07.2008 um 13:00 schrieb Alexander Mannsfeld:
>>> Hi there,
>>> since in WebTest R1710 are some neat features like "ignoring
>>> JS-Errors" we would like to migrate to the
>>> new version. Unfortunately there are some problems with the "new"
>>> As we are using some scripts for automatic analytics migrating would
>>> now create a huge need of manhours.
>>> Is there any way to upgrade with keeping the old reporting, like
>>> it is
>>> in R1551? (format for the resufile.xml and folder-structure).
>>> Thanks in advance,
>>> Alexander Mannsfeld
>>> Chief Quality Assurance Officer
>>> GD GameDuell GmbH
>>> WebTest mailing list
>> Alexander Mannsfeld
>> Chief Quality Assurance Officer
>> WebTest mailing list
> WebTest mailing list